[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20090616103445.A3008D56E@magilla.sf.frob.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 03:34:45 -0700 (PDT)
From: Roland McGrath <roland@...hat.com>
To: Petr Tesarik <ptesarik@...e.cz>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/8] clean up vdso-layout.lds.S
> Upfront, thank you very much for reviewing the series, Roland!
I'm glad to help.
> And there currently isn't one. But the writability of the vDSO is a bit
> more complicated. True, the VMA is initially mapped read-only, but it is
> possible to make it writable using mprotect().
Except for CONFIG_COMPAT_VDSO on X86_32.
> You may also set an
> INT3-style breakpoint in the vDSO area. So, it's all about policy. If
> there were any demand to make the vDSO writable, it could be done with a
> trivial patch.
There's a big difference between "writable" and "might be written".
> If we do not _WANT_ to make it writable, then we can simply add .data
> and .bss to .broken.
That is the correct thing to do.
> Yes, all .rel* sections should be in .broken, I guess.
You can toss an "void *x = &x;" into the vdso sources to verify that this
setup makes that explode gracefully.
> This was an attempt to discard .note.GNU-stack, which is what the
> default linker script does, but it appears that all .note.GNU-stack
> sections are zero-size, so this change does not make any difference.
Indeed it does not.
Thanks,
Roland
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists