[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090616122415.GA16630@elte.hu>
Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 14:24:15 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [GIT]: Networking
* Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu> wrote:
>
> * David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> wrote:
>
> > From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
> > Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 11:15:38 +0200
> >
> > >
> > > hm, FYI, these bits caused widespread scheduling-while-atomic
> > > problems on most of my test-systems:
> > >
> > > BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at net/core/sock.c:1851
> > > in_atomic(): 1, irqs_disabled(): 0, pid: 544, name: rcu_torture_rea
> > > 1 lock held by rcu_torture_rea/544:
> > > #0: (&sk->sk_timer){......}, at: [<ffffffff81060560>] run_timer_softirq+0x120/0x2e0
> > > Pid: 544, comm: rcu_torture_rea Tainted: G W 2.6.30-tip #54067
> > > Call Trace:
> > > [<ffffffff810820c3>] ? __debug_show_held_locks+0x13/0x30
> > > [<ffffffff810489e6>] __might_sleep+0xf6/0x120
> > > [<ffffffff81b3921d>] lock_sock_nested+0x3d/0x120
> > > [<ffffffff81c1a7d2>] x25_destroy_socket+0x22/0x180
> >
> > Please give this patch a try.
>
> Started testing it - thanks David!
With several dozen test-cycles (and [a]x25 reactivated) it looks
good and stable so far.
Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists