[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44L0.0906161028480.3740-100000@iolanthe.rowland.org>
Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 10:30:21 -0400 (EDT)
From: Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
cc: Oliver Neukum <oliver@...kum.org>, Magnus Damm <damm@...l.co.jp>,
<linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>
Subject: Re: [patch update] PM: Introduce core framework for run-time PM of
I/O devices
On Tue, 16 Jun 2009, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > Since pm_runtime_resume() takes care of powering up the parent, there's
> > no need for pm_request_resume() to worry about it also.
>
> But still it won't hurt to do it IMO, because the parents are then going to be
> resumed before our pm_runtime_resume() is called.
It's extra code that isn't needed. In essence, you are trading code
space for a shorter runtime stack.
> > The documentation should mention that the runtime_suspend method is
> > supposed to enable remote wakeup if it as available and if
> > device_may_wakeup(dev) is true.
>
> Well, I thought that was obvious. :-)
Sometimes it doesn't hurt to state the obvious! :-)
Alan Stern
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists