linux-kernel - Re: [patch update] PM: Introduce core framework for run-time PM of I/O devices

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 16 Jun 2009 10:30:21 -0400 (EDT)
From:	Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
To:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
cc:	Oliver Neukum <oliver@...kum.org>, Magnus Damm <damm@...l.co.jp>,
	<linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
	ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>
Subject: Re: [patch update] PM: Introduce core framework for run-time PM of
 I/O devices

On Tue, 16 Jun 2009, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:

> > Since pm_runtime_resume() takes care of powering up the parent, there's 
> > no need for pm_request_resume() to worry about it also.
> 
> But still it won't hurt to do it IMO, because the parents are then going to be
> resumed before our pm_runtime_resume() is called.

It's extra code that isn't needed.  In essence, you are trading code
space for a shorter runtime stack.

> > The documentation should mention that the runtime_suspend method is 
> > supposed to enable remote wakeup if it as available and if 
> > device_may_wakeup(dev) is true.
> 
> Well, I thought that was obvious. :-)

Sometimes it doesn't hurt to state the obvious!  :-)

Alan Stern

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/