linux-kernel - Re: [git pull] vfs patches, part 1

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20090616173101.GG8633@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Date:	Tue, 16 Jun 2009 18:31:01 +0100
From:	Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
To:	hooanon05@...oo.co.jp
Cc:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [git pull] vfs patches, part 1

On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 01:19:09AM +0900, hooanon05@...oo.co.jp wrote:

> These two patches conflict, or are unmatched.
> Al's patch adds one lock_kernel() call and several unlock_kernel() into
> do_remount_sb(), and then Alessio's patch removes only single pair of
> lock/unlock_kernel().
> Finally a few unlock_kernel() are left in do_remount_sb().

Nice catch...

Applied, will push today.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/