[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090616003557.GA22690@kroah.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 17:35:57 -0700
From: Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
To: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@...el.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>,
Hugh Dickins <hugh.dickins@...cali.co.uk>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
"riel@...hat.com" <riel@...hat.com>,
"chris.mason@...cle.com" <chris.mason@...cle.com>,
"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 21/22] HWPOISON: send uevent to report memory corruption
On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 10:45:41AM +0800, Wu Fengguang wrote:
> +static void hwpoison_release(struct kobject *kobj)
> +{
> +}
> +
> +static struct kobj_type hwpoison_ktype = {
> + .release = hwpoison_release,
> +};
{sigh}
Why did you include an empty release function? Was it because the
kernel complained when you had no release function? So, why would you
think that the acceptable solution to that warning would be an empty
release function instead?
Hint, this is totally wrong, provide a release function that ACTUALLY
DOES SOMETHING!!! Read the kobject documentation for details as to what
you need to do here.
ugh, I'm so tired of repeating this year after year after year, I feel
like a broken record...
This is broken, please fix it.
greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists