[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.01.0906152055580.3282@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 21:04:25 -0700 (PDT)
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
cc: Frédéric Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Li Zefan <lizf@...fujitsu.com>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] WARN(): add a \n to the message printk
On Mon, 15 Jun 2009, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> Nice idea ...
>
> Puts some pressure on current intentionally 'naked' printks (there's
> still a few of them) - but that's OK, it's not like KERN_CONT (or
> pr_cont()) is that hard to add.
I looked some more, and there's a _ton_ of these naked printk's in the
partition handling code.
So while I think the patch was a good idea, I don't feel like exposing
quite that many old printk's and forcing people to use KERN_CONT. Here's
an alternate patch that has a somewhat similar approach, but tries much
harder to leave naked printk's as-is.
So instead of always adding a '\n' if it doesn't say KERN_CONT, it just
adds '\n' if it has a KERN_xyz level. It also modifies the code to _only_
look at the beginning of the printk - if you have a multi-line printk,
it will take the log-level from the beginning of the printk, and nowhere
else.
And it will take the log-level from the beginning of the printk
*regardless* of whether it thinks you're at the beginning of a line or
not.
So with this, KERN_CONT is not as important, but it_is_ meaningful: if you
want to print out something like "<%d>", then you _have_ to have a
KERN_xyz header, and if you don't want to force a new line, you have to do
printk(KERN_CONT "<%d>", n);
because otherwise the printk code will think that what you want to print
out is the loglevel.
But for all the traditional printk()'s that don't have KERN_CONT (or other
loglevel info), and print out strings that are not of that "<.>" form,
they'll still work as they used to.
And no, this does not necessarily fix Arjan's problem: it only adds the
newline before printk's that _do_ have a KERN_<lvl> format. So now, in
order to get the extra '\n' after the WARN_ON() line, somebody needs to
make sure that the printk's in the warning printing have loglevels.
Arjan?
Linus
---
include/linux/kernel.h | 2 +-
kernel/printk.c | 31 ++++++++++++++++++++++---------
2 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/kernel.h b/include/linux/kernel.h
index 883cd44..066bb1e 100644
--- a/include/linux/kernel.h
+++ b/include/linux/kernel.h
@@ -102,7 +102,7 @@ extern const char linux_proc_banner[];
* line that had no enclosing \n). Only to be used by core/arch code
* during early bootup (a continued line is not SMP-safe otherwise).
*/
-#define KERN_CONT ""
+#define KERN_CONT "<c>"
extern int console_printk[];
diff --git a/kernel/printk.c b/kernel/printk.c
index 5052b54..a87770c 100644
--- a/kernel/printk.c
+++ b/kernel/printk.c
@@ -687,20 +687,33 @@ asmlinkage int vprintk(const char *fmt, va_list args)
sizeof(printk_buf) - printed_len, fmt, args);
+ p = printk_buf;
+
+ /* Do we have a loglevel in the string? */
+ if (p[0] == '<') {
+ unsigned char c = p[1];
+ if (c && p[2] == '>') {
+ switch (c) {
+ case '0' ... '7': /* loglevel */
+ current_log_level = c - '0';
+ if (!new_text_line) {
+ emit_log_char('\n');
+ new_text_line = 1;
+ }
+ /* Fallthrough - skip the loglevel */
+ case 'c': /* KERN_CONT */
+ p += 3;
+ break;
+ }
+ }
+ }
+
/*
* Copy the output into log_buf. If the caller didn't provide
* appropriate log level tags, we insert them here
*/
- for (p = printk_buf; *p; p++) {
+ for ( ; *p; p++) {
if (new_text_line) {
- /* If a token, set current_log_level and skip over */
- if (p[0] == '<' && p[1] >= '0' && p[1] <= '7' &&
- p[2] == '>') {
- current_log_level = p[1] - '0';
- p += 3;
- printed_len -= 3;
- }
-
/* Always output the token */
emit_log_char('<');
emit_log_char(current_log_level + '0');
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists