linux-kernel - Re: Volunteering for stable patch review process

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20090616191541.GA29254@kroah.com>
Date:	Tue, 16 Jun 2009 12:15:41 -0700
From:	Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
To:	Chris Wright <chrisw@...s-sol.org>
Cc:	Stefan Bader <stefan.bader@...onical.com>,
	"Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@...il.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Tim Gardner <tim.gardner@...onical.com>,
	Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
Subject: Re: Volunteering for stable patch review process

On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 12:00:03PM -0700, Chris Wright wrote:
> * Greg KH (greg@...ah.com) wrote:
> > Hm, we now have 17 people on the list.  This might be getting a bit
> > messy for some email systems to have such a large CC: list, perhaps we
> > should look into setting up an email list, like the stable-commits list
> > is used.
> 
> Heh, was just thinking the same.  Yup, think a list would be better.
> 
> > Or perhaps we should just use the stable-commits list instead?  Chris,
> > any thoughts?
> 
> stable-commits is good from my pov, but it's effectively read only.

Yeah, it's also higher volume which some reviewers might not like.

Should we create "stable-review" instead?

thanks,

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/