linux-kernel - Re: [GIT PULL v2] Early SLAB fixes for 2.6.31

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20090616044601.GB28596@wotan.suse.de>
Date:	Tue, 16 Jun 2009 06:46:01 +0200
From:	Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>
To:	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
Cc:	Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>,
	Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>,
	torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, cl@...ux-foundation.org,
	kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com, lizf@...fujitsu.com, mingo@...e.hu,
	yinghai@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL v2] Early SLAB fixes for 2.6.31

On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 07:31:38AM +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-06-15 at 13:23 +0200, Nick Piggin wrote:
> > > I think the main problem isn't necessarily init code per se, but the
> > > pile of -common- code that can be called both at init time and
> > later.
> > 
> > Just seems bogus argument. Everwhere else that does this (ie.
> > allocations that are called from multiple allocation contexts)
> > passes correct gfp flags down.
> 
> So you say we should create new variants of all these APIs that take gfp
> flags as arguments just because they might be called early during boot :

No, just create the ones that actually are called in early boot.

 
>  - All the vmalloc interfaces (__get_vm_area() and it's 5 or 6 variants)
>  - Allocation of PCI host bridges data structures in the powerpc code
>  - Allocation of interrupt controller domains in the powerpc code
>  - Page table allocations (oops ... can't change that arch specific,
> would have to be a generic change)

No it would not. If an arch (eg s390) does this in early boot, then
it can create its own allocation function which takes a gfp mask, and
define the generic one to just pass it a GFP_KERNEL. generic code does
not call this in early boot of course.


>  - ioremap (which call both __get_vm_area() and page table allocs)
>  - ...
> 
> Are you just insane ? :-)

I think so, but that's besides the point ;)

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/