linux-kernel - Re: Ping: Re: [PATCH 0/2] i386: espfix fixes

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4A380C49.6050206@aknet.ru>
Date:	Wed, 17 Jun 2009 01:19:05 +0400
From:	Stas Sergeev <stsp@...et.ru>
To:	Alexander van Heukelum <heukelum@...tmail.fm>
CC:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...il.com>,
	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, Zachary Amsden <zach@...are.com>,
	Chuck Ebbert <76306.1226@...puserve.com>,
	Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>,
	Linux kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Ping: Re: [PATCH 0/2] i386: espfix fixes

Hi.

17.06.2009 00:03, Alexander van Heukelum wrote:
> Just wanted to get a little attention for the espfix fixes...
>
> http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/7/106 : fix return to 16-bit stack from NMI
> http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/7/109 : fix/simplify espfix, move it into
> assembly
>
> Any objections against those?
Well, the dynamic limits were advocated
by Zach and Chuck, so lets ask them first
(added CCs).

For the rest:
Acked-by: Stas Sergeev <stsp@...et.ru>

In particular, I am asking now myself why
have I used THREAD_SIZE there, and can't
recall the reason...
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/