[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1245225518.13761.21617.camel@twins>
Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 09:58:38 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Hugh Dickins <hugh.dickins@...cali.co.uk>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
mingo@...hat.com, hpa@...or.com, paulus@...ba.org, acme@...hat.com,
efault@....de, npiggin@...e.de, tglx@...utronix.de,
linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [tip:perfcounters/core] x86: Add NMI types for kmap_atomic
On Tue, 2009-06-16 at 13:38 +0100, Hugh Dickins wrote:
>
> Something else to throw in: what if they were not just atomic,
> but also replaced the current sleeping kmaps? i.e. a task context
> carries around its own stack of these.
I actually did that once, but it means the task needs to be cpu-affine,
because fixmaps have different addresses between cpus. And disabling
migration for tasks has subtle side-effects so I dropped that again.
However, I recently considered the possiblity of putting the fixmaps in
the new per-cpu address space so that we might use the %gs segment to
normalize the fixmap addresses between the cpus.
This would allow full preemptible kmaps (yay for -rt).
However I suspect it might greatly complicate kmaps for the !i386 world.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists