[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090617101354.4100a910@dhcp-lab-109.englab.brq.redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 10:13:54 +0200
From: Stanislaw Gruszka <sgruszka@...hat.com>
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Roland McGrath <roland@...hat.com>,
Vitaly Mayatskikh <vmayatsk@...hat.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] wait_task_zombie: do not use thread_group_cputime()
On Mon, 15 Jun 2009 23:26:51 +0200
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com> wrote:
> There is no reason for thread_group_cputime() in wait_task_zombie(),
> there must be no other threads.
>
> This call was previously needed to collect the per-cpu data which
> we do not have any longer.
Is similar change for posix_cpu_timers_exit_group() correct and worthwhile ?
void posix_cpu_timers_exit_group(struct task_struct *tsk)
{
- struct task_cputime cputime;
+ struct signal_struct *const sig = tsk->signal;
- thread_group_cputimer(tsk, &cputime);
cleanup_timers(tsk->signal->cpu_timers,
- cputime.utime, cputime.stime, cputime.sum_exec_runtime);
+ cputime_add(tsk->utime, sig->utime),
+ cputime_add(tsk->stime, sig->stime),
+ tsk->se.sum_exec_runtime + sig->sum_sched_runtime);
}
Regards
Stanislaw
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists