linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/6] atmel-mci: Unified Atmel MCI drivers (AVR32 & AT91)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20090617120849.4b11386a@hskinnemoen-d830>
Date:	Wed, 17 Jun 2009 12:08:49 +0200
From:	Haavard Skinnemoen <haavard.skinnemoen@...el.com>
To:	Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...el.com>
Cc:	Rob Emanuele <rob@...nuele.us>,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.arm.linux.org.uk,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] atmel-mci: Unified Atmel MCI drivers (AVR32 & AT91)

Nicolas Ferre wrote:
> > -#define ATMCI_DATA_ERROR_FLAGS	(MCI_DCRCE | MCI_DTOE | MCI_OVRE | MCI_UNRE)
> > +#define ATMCI_DATA_ERROR_FLAGS	(MCI_RINDE | MCI_RDIRE | MCI_RCRCE  \
> > +				 | MCI_RENDE | MCI_RTOE | MCI_DCRCE \
> > +				 | MCI_DTOE | MCI_OVRE | MCI_UNRE)  
> 
> Haavard, is it ok to add those flags on an AVR32 platform for now ?

It probably doesn't hurt on AVR32. But I'm not a great fan since it
seems like the wrong thing to do, and it may simply mask the real
problem.

Haavard
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/