[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090617140205.GA8632@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 16:02:05 +0200
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To: Stanislaw Gruszka <sgruszka@...hat.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Roland McGrath <roland@...hat.com>,
Vitaly Mayatskikh <vmayatsk@...hat.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] posix_cpu_timers_exit_group: do not use
thread_group_cputimer()
On 06/17, Stanislaw Gruszka wrote:
>
> When the process exits we don't have to run new cputimer nor use running one
> (as it not accounts when tsk->exit_state != 0) to get process CPU times.
> As there is only one thread we can just use CPU times fields form task
> and signal structs.
>
> Signed-off-by: Stanislaw Gruszka <sgruszka@...hat.com>
> ---
> kernel/posix-cpu-timers.c | 7 ++++---
> 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/posix-cpu-timers.c b/kernel/posix-cpu-timers.c
> index bece7c0..e33a21c 100644
> --- a/kernel/posix-cpu-timers.c
> +++ b/kernel/posix-cpu-timers.c
> @@ -521,11 +521,12 @@ void posix_cpu_timers_exit(struct task_struct *tsk)
> }
> void posix_cpu_timers_exit_group(struct task_struct *tsk)
> {
> - struct task_cputime cputime;
> + struct signal_struct *const sig = tsk->signal;
>
> - thread_group_cputimer(tsk, &cputime);
> cleanup_timers(tsk->signal->cpu_timers,
> - cputime.utime, cputime.stime, cputime.sum_exec_runtime);
> + cputime_add(tsk->utime, sig->utime),
> + cputime_add(tsk->stime, sig->stime),
> + tsk->se.sum_exec_runtime + sig->sum_sched_runtime);
> }
I think this is correct.
Oleg.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists