lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <9b1675090906161826q12db9dd3wdde22e603a395ee6@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Tue, 16 Jun 2009 19:26:18 -0600
From:	"Trenton D. Adams" <trenton.d.adams@...il.com>
To:	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: BUG??? Incorrect metadata area header checksum

Hi Guys,

I have had problems several times, where my LVM metadata gets
completely messed up.  I have no idea how it's happening.  When I look
at /var/log/messages, I am not finding any IO errors of any kind.  Not
previously, and not this time.  I'm starting to think there is a small
bug in the kernel somewhere regarding this, that causes it to loose
it's marbles regarding the LVM metadata.

A couple of weeks ago, I had to recover my system from the LVM backups
at the start of the disk.  At first, I had no idea what I was doing,
but after using pvck, I quickly noticed that it had offsets to the
metadata backups on the disk.  I was then able to recover from that.
All I had done is a routine move of my physical extents over to
another disk.  I rebooted, it worked, I rebooted again, and it quit
working.

I had this problem again yesterday/today.  This time it was a backup
drive, not my primary, so it was easy to restore from the backups kept
in /etc/lvm/backup/

As you can see, with the example below, there is no disk corruption at
all, it simply lost it's metadata marbles, and a simple vgcfgrestore
fixes the problem.  So, what I want to know, is what could possibly
cause this?  FYI, I had just finished adding a whole bunch more data
(overnight last night) to the drive when I noticed today that it was
corrupted.  I reboot, and sure enough, I could not load up the volume
group or volumes.  So, I'm wondering if somehow there is an erroneous
overlap in storage area of the disk, mixed up between files, and
metadata, that could cause this?  After all, it was as simple as
adding more data to the volume.  The actual LVM info has not changed
in a couple of weeks, so there is no good reason for LVM to change
it's metadata without my approval.

tdamac ~ # vgchange -ay
  Incorrect metadata area header checksum
  Incorrect metadata area header checksum
  Incorrect metadata area header checksum
  Volume group "bak" inconsistent
  Incorrect metadata area header checksum
  Incorrect metadata area header checksum
  WARNING: Inconsistent metadata found for VG bak - updating to use version 23
  Incorrect metadata area header checksum
  Automatic metadata correction failed
  Incorrect metadata area header checksum
  4 logical volume(s) in volume group "s" now active

tdamac ~ # pvcreate -ff -u 0dNrQJ-torK-1wmT-TxIY-1jMY-QWA4-BHIrKe
--restorefile /etc/lvm/backup/bak /dev/sdb1
  Incorrect metadata area header checksum
  Incorrect metadata area header checksum
  WARNING: Volume group bak is not consistent
Really INITIALIZE physical volume "/dev/sdb1" of volume group "bak" [y/n]? y
  WARNING: Forcing physical volume creation on /dev/sdb1 of volume group "bak"
  Physical volume "/dev/sdb1" successfully created
tdamac ~ # vgcfgrestore -f /etc/lvm/backup/bak -v bak
  Restored volume group bak
tdamac ~ # vgchange -ay
  1 logical volume(s) in volume group "bak" now active
tdamac ~ # e2fsck -f /dev/bak/safe
e2fsck 1.41.3 (12-Oct-2008)
Pass 1: Checking inodes, blocks, and sizes
Pass 2: Checking directory structure
Pass 3: Checking directory connectivity
Pass 4: Checking reference counts
Pass 5: Checking group summary information
/dev/bak/safe: 2234755/91578368 files (0.4% non-contiguous),
197843954/366283776 blocks
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ