linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/6] perf_counter: powerpc: Enable use of software counters on 32-bit powerpc

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <8C6954A9-BE4C-47F5-AD87-A1D0EAF43F8A@kernel.crashing.org>
Date:	Wed, 17 Jun 2009 09:24:02 -0500
From:	Kumar Gala <galak@...nel.crashing.org>
To:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc:	Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>, linuxppc-dev@...abs.org,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] perf_counter: powerpc: Enable use of software counters on 32-bit powerpc


On Jun 17, 2009, at 9:21 AM, Ingo Molnar wrote:

>
> * Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org> wrote:
>
>> This depends on the generic atomic64_t patches, which are now in
>> Linus' tree.  Ingo, if you're putting these in, please pull Linus'
>> tree in first.
>
> Note, i've created a new branch, tip:perfcounters/powerpc, so we can
> keep these things separate and Ben can pull them too. I see there
> was some review feedback - do you want to send a v2 version perhaps?

Out of interest, is the intent to try and get these changes into .31?   
I ask because I want to know if I should try to find time to add  
support for the FSL embedded perfmon ASAP or not.

- k
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/