[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4A38FD96.6090109@goop.org>
Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 07:28:38 -0700
From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>
To: Robert Richter <robert.richter@....com>
CC: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@...nel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/16] x86/oprofile: add module parameter option to force
a core 2 cpu
On 06/17/09 03:57, Robert Richter wrote:
> On 16.06.09 13:15:40, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
>
>> From: Robert Richter<robert.richter@....com>
>>
>> The current userland does not yet fully support all cpu types
>> implemented in the kernel. With the module parameter:
>>
>> oprofile.cpu_type=core_2
>>
>> the kernel reports a core_2 cpu to the userland on an Intel system and
>> thus makes oprofile usable with current distros.
>>
>> Cc: Linus Torvalds<torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
>> Cc: Andi Kleen<ak@...ux.intel.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Robert Richter<robert.richter@....com>
>> ---
>> Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt | 3 ++-
>> arch/x86/oprofile/nmi_int.c | 17 ++++++++++++++---
>> 2 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>
>
> Jeremy,
>
> I dropped this patch. See this thread:
>
> http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/5/6/234
>
> Does your patch series depends on this?
>
Confused. I haven't done anything with oprofile or nmi lately. I don't
recognize the patch you're quoting.
J
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists