[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090617144540.GB3089@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 17:45:40 +0300
From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
To: Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@...ell.com>
Cc: kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, avi@...hat.com,
davidel@...ilserver.org, paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, mingo@...e.hu
Subject: Re: [KVM-RFC PATCH 1/2] eventfd: add an explicit srcu based
notifier interface
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 02:09:38PM -0400, Gregory Haskins wrote:
> > What do you mean by copy_to_user(other->mm) here? If you are going to switch
> > to another mm, then I think current->mm must be valid (I think it's not enough
> > that you can sleep). So preemptible() might not be enough.
> >
>
> I dont currently use switch_mm, if that is what you mean. I save the
> task_struct into the appropriate context so current->mm doesn't matter
> to me. I never use it. All I need (afaik) is to acquire the proper
> mutex first. I am not an MM expert, so perhaps I have this wrong but it
> does appear to work properly even from kthread context.
>
> -Greg
>
>
I think I saw get_user_pages + memcpy in your patch. Yes, that works
without switching contexts but it's slower than copy to user if you are
in the right context, and AFAIK it's slower than get_user_pages_fast.
--
MST
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists