linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/1] Recurse when searching for empty slots in resources trees

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.01.0906170924180.16802@localhost.localdomain>
Date:	Wed, 17 Jun 2009 09:28:54 -0700 (PDT)
From:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Ivan Kokshaysky <ink@...assic.park.msu.ru>
cc:	Andrew Patterson <andrew.patterson@...com>,
	linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/1] Recurse when searching for empty slots in resources
 trees

On Wed, 17 Jun 2009, Ivan Kokshaysky wrote:

> On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 04:32:18PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > > So your patch may fix a bug, but I'm pretty sure I've seen a patch from 
> > > Ivan that should _also_ fix it, and that I would expect to do it not by 
> > > just tweaking a fundamentally ambiguous case.
> > 
> > Hmm. For the life of me, I can't seem to find this patch. Maybe it wasn't 
> > Ivan who wrote it after all. Or maybe my google-fu is weak. Or maybe I'm 
> > just delusional, and the patch never existed.
> 
> No, it wasn't me.

Ingo pointed out that it was probably Yinghai. And now that I'm googling 
for the right author, I found it on the first try. It's this patch

	http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/4/22/433

I was thinking of.

But that was before I realized that pci_assign_resource() _already_ always 
chose the right parent bus (and it was just that it can't handle 
transparent buses at all). I then ended up not understanding how the 
incorrect nesting could possibly happen at all. So Yinghai's patch is 
irrelevant for this particular problem.

And:

> Anyway, pci_claim_resource() fix suggested by Matthew seems to be
> correct, if the problematic system was indeed ia64 and not x86.

I agree. That one explains why the nesting is wrong, and also why I 
couldn't figure out how it happened.

		Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/