linux-kernel - Re: WARNING: at mm/page_alloc.c:1159 get_page_from

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20090617165256.GA8143@elte.hu>
Date:	Wed, 17 Jun 2009 18:52:56 +0200
From:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
	fengguang.wu@...el.com, Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: WARNING: at mm/page_alloc.c:1159
	get_page_from_freelist+0x325/0x655()


* Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:

> On Wed, 17 Jun 2009, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > 
> > a new warning started popping up today, in the new page allocator 
> > code. The allocation came from kmemleak:
> 
> We should probably print out the order.
> 
> Right now it warns about any order but 0, and I think that's 
> likely bogus. It's fine to allow small orders (I'd suggest 0-2), 
> since we should always be able to get those, and small kmalloc's 
> generally do want more than one page just to avoid crazy 
> fragmentation issues.
> 
> See, for example, the whole 'slab_break_gfp_order' logic in 
> mm/slab.c: it very much expects to be able to use order-1 
> allocations for kmalloc() if there is enough memory (where 
> "enough" is actually just 32MB). And slub seems to put some limit 
> at PAGE_ALLOC_COSTLY_ORDER (3).
> 
> So apart from anything else (ie this particular case is possibly 
> fixable in kmemleak), I do think that we should likely allow at 
> least order-1 and possible order-2 allocations with __GFP_NOFAIL 
> too.

I saw about half a dozen of different warning patterns during the 
day, so the warning definitely feels a bit over-eager.

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/