linux-kernel - Re: [GIT pull] ntp updates for 2.6.31

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20090617172601.GA3493@elte.hu>
Date:	Wed, 17 Jun 2009 19:26:01 +0200
From:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To:	Miroslav Lichvar <mlichvar@...hat.com>
Cc:	John Stultz <johnstul@...ibm.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT pull] ntp updates for 2.6.31


* Miroslav Lichvar <mlichvar@...hat.com> wrote:

> Still, I'd really like to see the original behavior restored. Most 
> of the users complaining about slow convergence are probably just 
> hitting the calibration problem, which needs to be fixed by other 
> means than making PLL faster. Also, users of other systems seem to 
> be happy with their slow convergence. At least that's the 
> impression I have from NTP lists.

Wouldnt the goal be to calibrate as fast as possible? (Without any 
bad oscillation)

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/