[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090617185219.GJ8633@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 19:52:19 +0100
From: Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Andreas Dilger <adilger@....com>,
David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-afs@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/17] [RFC] AFS: Implement OpenAFS pioctls(version)s
On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 11:44:18AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > O_NOFOLLOW *will* open their mountpoints just fine, without triggering
> > automount.
>
> That's not the problem with O_NOFOLLOW.
>
> The problem is that if you want to actually open the symlink itself (say,
> you do some filesystem cleanup operation on it, like saying "drop the
> caches of this file"), you can't do it. O_NOFOLLOW won't open the symlink,
> it will just refuse to follow it, and return an error.
... so we need a syscall that would do that "drop the caches" operation.
_After_ having decided that it's really needed for symlinks. With decision
made on per-operation basis. Sure, it will be painful for people proposing
such operations, which is just fine by me - barriers to adding new primitives
shouldn't be low.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists