[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1245271510-31542-6-git-send-email-jblunck@suse.de>
Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 22:45:09 +0200
From: Jan Blunck <jblunck@...e.de>
To: viro@...IV.linux.org.uk
Cc: linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
vaurora@...hat.com, hch@....de, miklos@...redi.hu
Subject: [PATCH] VFS: Make real_lookup() return a struct path
This patch changes real_lookup() into returning a struct path.
Signed-off-by: Jan Blunck <jblunck@...e.de>
Signed-off-by: Valerie Aurora (Henson) <vaurora@...hat.com>
---
fs/namei.c | 82 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------------
1 files changed, 51 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/namei.c b/fs/namei.c
index 9b12363..f40f42c 100644
--- a/fs/namei.c
+++ b/fs/namei.c
@@ -462,10 +462,11 @@ ok:
* make sure that nobody added the entry to the dcache in the meantime..
* SMP-safe
*/
-static struct dentry * real_lookup(struct dentry * parent, struct qstr * name, struct nameidata *nd)
+static int real_lookup(struct nameidata *nd, struct qstr *name,
+ struct path *path)
{
- struct dentry * result;
- struct inode *dir = parent->d_inode;
+ struct inode *dir = nd->path.dentry->d_inode;
+ int res = 0;
mutex_lock(&dir->i_mutex);
/*
@@ -482,27 +483,36 @@ static struct dentry * real_lookup(struct dentry * parent, struct qstr * name, s
*
* so doing d_lookup() (with seqlock), instead of lockfree __d_lookup
*/
- result = d_lookup(parent, name);
- if (!result) {
+ path->dentry = d_lookup(nd->path.dentry, name);
+ path->mnt = nd->path.mnt;
+ if (!path->dentry) {
struct dentry *dentry;
/* Don't create child dentry for a dead directory. */
- result = ERR_PTR(-ENOENT);
- if (IS_DEADDIR(dir))
+ if (IS_DEADDIR(dir)) {
+ res = -ENOENT;
goto out_unlock;
+ }
- dentry = d_alloc(parent, name);
- result = ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
+ dentry = d_alloc(nd->path.dentry, name);
if (dentry) {
- result = dir->i_op->lookup(dir, dentry, nd);
- if (result)
+ path->dentry = dir->i_op->lookup(dir, dentry, nd);
+ if (path->dentry) {
dput(dentry);
- else
- result = dentry;
+ if (IS_ERR(path->dentry)) {
+ res = PTR_ERR(path->dentry);
+ path->dentry = NULL;
+ path->mnt = NULL;
+ }
+ } else
+ path->dentry = dentry;
+ } else {
+ res = -ENOMEM;
+ path->mnt = NULL;
}
out_unlock:
mutex_unlock(&dir->i_mutex);
- return result;
+ return res;
}
/*
@@ -510,12 +520,20 @@ out_unlock:
* we waited on the semaphore. Need to revalidate.
*/
mutex_unlock(&dir->i_mutex);
- if (result->d_op && result->d_op->d_revalidate) {
- result = do_revalidate(result, nd);
- if (!result)
- result = ERR_PTR(-ENOENT);
+ if (path->dentry->d_op && path->dentry->d_op->d_revalidate) {
+ path->dentry = do_revalidate(path->dentry, nd);
+ if (!path->dentry) {
+ res = -ENOENT;
+ path->mnt = NULL;
+ }
+ if (IS_ERR(path->dentry)) {
+ res = PTR_ERR(path->dentry);
+ path->dentry = NULL;
+ path->mnt = NULL;
+ }
}
- return result;
+
+ return res;
}
/*
@@ -781,35 +799,37 @@ static __always_inline void follow_dotdot(struct nameidata *nd)
static int do_lookup(struct nameidata *nd, struct qstr *name,
struct path *path)
{
- struct vfsmount *mnt = nd->path.mnt;
- struct dentry *dentry = __d_lookup(nd->path.dentry, name);
+ int err;
- if (!dentry)
+ path->dentry = __d_lookup(nd->path.dentry, name);
+ path->mnt = nd->path.mnt;
+ if (!path->dentry)
goto need_lookup;
- if (dentry->d_op && dentry->d_op->d_revalidate)
+ if (path->dentry->d_op && path->dentry->d_op->d_revalidate)
goto need_revalidate;
+
done:
- path->mnt = mnt;
- path->dentry = dentry;
__follow_mount(path);
return 0;
need_lookup:
- dentry = real_lookup(nd->path.dentry, name, nd);
- if (IS_ERR(dentry))
+ err = real_lookup(nd, name, path);
+ if (err)
goto fail;
goto done;
need_revalidate:
- dentry = do_revalidate(dentry, nd);
- if (!dentry)
+ path->dentry = do_revalidate(path->dentry, nd);
+ if (!path->dentry)
goto need_lookup;
- if (IS_ERR(dentry))
+ if (IS_ERR(path->dentry)) {
+ err = PTR_ERR(path->dentry);
goto fail;
+ }
goto done;
fail:
- return PTR_ERR(dentry);
+ return err;
}
/*
--
1.6.0.2
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists