[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1245197925.21602.0.camel@pasglop>
Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 10:18:45 +1000
From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc: Scott Wood <scottwood@...escale.com>,
Chris Pringle <chris.pringle@...el.com>,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: PowerPC PCI DMA issues (prefetch/coherency?)
On Tue, 2009-06-16 at 20:02 +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Tuesday 16 June 2009, Scott Wood wrote:
> > > If the
> > > device is the only one, you can also use dma_alloc_noncoherent() and
> > > flush explicitly with dma_cache_sync().
> >
> > I don't see how that would help -- aren't those also controlled by
> > CONFIG_NOT_COHERENT_CACHE?
>
> Ah, yes you are right. PowerPC implements dma_alloc_noncoherent as
> dma_alloc_coherent, so dma_cache_sync() is actually a NOP (or should be).
But we still need to sync the result of dma_map_* when used multiple
times for a single mapping.
Cheers,
Ben.
> Actually there seems to be a bug in here: Since dma_alloc_noncoherent
> gives you a coherent mapping (or NULL) on noncoherent machines,
> dma_cache_sync() is redundant and should not actually flush the
> cache, or we should change dma_alloc_noncoherent to do a simple
> alloc_pages on CONFIG_NON_COHERENT_CACHE and leave dma_cache_sync()
> as it is.
>
> Arnd <><
> _______________________________________________
> Linuxppc-dev mailing list
> Linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org
> https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists