linux-kernel - Accessing user memory from NMI

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 18 Jun 2009 18:20:44 +1000
From:	Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>
To:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
CC:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, benh@...nel.crashing.org
Subject: Accessing user memory from NMI

What was the conclusion you guys came to about doing a user stack
backtrace in an NMI handler?  Are you going to access user memory
directly or are you going to use the __fast_get_user_pages approach?

Ben H and I were talking today about what we'd need in order to be
able to read user memory in a PMU interrupt handler.  It looks like we
could read user memory directly with a bit of care, on 64-bit at
least.  Because of the MMU hash table that would almost always work
provided the page has already been touched (which stack pages would
have been), but there is a small chance that the access might fail
even if the address has a valid PTE.  At that point we could fall back
to the __fast_get_user_pages method, but I'm not sure it's worth it.

Paul.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/