[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090618083852.GA5793@in.ibm.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 14:08:52 +0530
From: "K.Prasad" <prasad@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Patch 1/2] ksym_tracer:Fix line-wrapping after removal of ksym
tracer entry
On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 07:06:07AM +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 04:35:04AM +0530, K.Prasad wrote:
> > Removal of a ksym entry results in missing information and an early return with
> > TRACE_TYPE_PARTIAL_LINE code (minus the line return). This patch modifies the
> > output function to unconditionally add a line return irrespective of the
> > return code.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: K.Prasad <prasad@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
> > ---
> > kernel/trace/trace_ksym.c | 27 +++++++++++++++------------
> > 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
> >
> > Index: linux-2.6-tip.hbkpt/kernel/trace/trace_ksym.c
> > ===================================================================
> > --- linux-2.6-tip.hbkpt.orig/kernel/trace/trace_ksym.c
> > +++ linux-2.6-tip.hbkpt/kernel/trace/trace_ksym.c
> > @@ -391,29 +391,32 @@ static enum print_line_t ksym_trace_outp
> >
> > ret = trace_seq_printf(s, "%-15s %-5d %-3d %-20s ", field->p_name,
> > entry->pid, iter->cpu, field->ksym_name);
> > - if (!ret)
> > - return TRACE_TYPE_PARTIAL_LINE;
> > + if (!ret) {
> > + ret = TRACE_TYPE_PARTIAL_LINE;
> > + goto err_ret;
> > + }
> >
> > + ret = TRACE_TYPE_PARTIAL_LINE;
> > switch (field->ksym_hbp->info.type) {
> > case HW_BREAKPOINT_WRITE:
> > - ret = trace_seq_printf(s, " W ");
> > + if (!trace_seq_printf(s, " W "))
> > + goto err_ret;
> > break;
> > case HW_BREAKPOINT_RW:
> > - ret = trace_seq_printf(s, " RW ");
> > + if (!trace_seq_printf(s, " RW "))
> > + goto err_ret;
> > break;
> > default:
> > - return TRACE_TYPE_PARTIAL_LINE;
> > + goto err_ret;
> > }
> >
> > - if (!ret)
> > - return TRACE_TYPE_PARTIAL_LINE;
> > -
> > sprint_symbol(str, field->ip);
> > ret = trace_seq_printf(s, "%-20s\n", str);
> > - if (!ret)
> > - return TRACE_TYPE_PARTIAL_LINE;
> > -
> > - return TRACE_TYPE_HANDLED;
> > + if (ret)
> > + return TRACE_TYPE_HANDLED;
> > +err_ret:
> > + trace_seq_printf(s, "\n");
> > + return ret;
>
>
> As told in my email just before, TRACE_TYPE_PARTIAL_LINE
> won't print a truncated line or a partial line. Instead, it
> will be ignored and entirely retried later.
> Then your newline will be ignored.
>
> ..unless we have a bug in trace.c
>
Yes, I see that TRACE_TYPE_PARTIAL_LINE isn't the cause but the early
return that happens (without printing the \n character) because of
missing data.
> I'm not sure what it the origin of the concatenated printed entries
> Ingo has reported.
>
The existing code in -tip reads like this:
397 switch (field->ksym_hbp->info.type) {
398 case HW_BREAKPOINT_WRITE:
399 ret = trace_seq_printf(s, " W ");
400 break;
401 case HW_BREAKPOINT_RW:
402 ret = trace_seq_printf(s, " RW ");
403 break;
404 default:
405 return TRACE_TYPE_PARTIAL_LINE;
406 }
407
408 if (!ret)
409 return TRACE_TYPE_PARTIAL_LINE;
410
411 sprint_symbol(str, field->ip);
412 ret = trace_seq_printf(s, "%-20s\n", str);
413 if (!ret)
414 return TRACE_TYPE_PARTIAL_LINE;
415
Si, if the control returns early at line 405 it skips the line at 412
which prints a newline character. Line 405 is executed if
field->ksym_hbp->info.type is 0 which is true for an entry that is
removed from the filter (e.g. echo jiffies:--- > ksym_trace_filter) and
no amount of retries will help it get some new data (as it is already
free-ed).
> Did you reproduce it and then this patch fixed it?
>
Yes, it was reproduced and tested but actually it is the second patch that
helps resolve this. The "trace_seq_printf(s, "\n");" isn't required at
all.
I will re-send a new patch to you which fixes the line concatenation and
machine stall issue (after symbol removal in ksym_tracer).
Thanks,
K.Prasad
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists