[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <cone.1245333947.155956.30118.1000@arca>
Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 16:05:47 +0200
From: Peter Feuerer <pfe@...e.net>
To: Andreas Mohr <andi@...as.de>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <petkovbb@...glemail.com>,
Ed Tomlinson <edt@....ca>, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>,
Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...f.ucam.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Request driver inclusion - acer aspire one fan control
Hi,
Andreas Mohr writes:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 03:31:35PM +0200, Peter Feuerer wrote:
>> You are partly right, setting the fan to auto in
>> "acerhdf_revert_to_bios_mode" can be removed, as this is done by the
>> thermal layer when calling "acerhdf_set_cur_state" with
>> disable_kernelmode=1.
>
> No, it was done _specifically_ this way to make sure that _exactly when_
> switching away from kernel mode FAN_AUTO _always_ (by asking people to
> always call this central function) gets set, too.
> I don't want to depend on a separate, _uncontrollable_ entity
> (thermal layer function) to have to run sometime later
> in order to set the fan to FAN_AUTO (IOW, BIOS-controlled mode) accordingly.
> _Of course_ this FAN_AUTO call is redundant in _most_ cases, but very
> intentionally so. Anything else would be woefully unsafe (with a fan
> remaining in FAN_OFF position until machine meltdown).
Ok, that sounds reasonable.
--peter
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists