[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090618181335.GB19771@sequoia.sous-sol.org>
Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 11:13:35 -0700
From: Chris Wright <chrisw@...s-sol.org>
To: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@...el.com>
Cc: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
"'Linus Torvalds'" <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
"'Stephen Rothwell'" <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
"'Andrew Morton'" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"'Ingo Molnar'" <mingo@...e.hu>,
"'Christopher Wright'" <chrisw@...hat.com>,
"'Allen Kay'" <allen.m.kay@...el.com>,
"'iommu'" <iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
"'lkml'" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] IOMMU Identity Mapping Support:
iommu_identity_mapping definition
* Fenghua Yu (fenghua.yu@...el.com) wrote:
> IOMMU Identity Mapping Support: iommu_identity_mapping definition
>
> Identity mapping for IOMMU defines a single domain to 1:1 map all pci devices
> to all usable memory.
>
> This will reduces map/unmap overhead in DMA API's and improve IOMMU performance.
> On 10Gb network cards, Netperf shows no performance degradation compared to
> non-IOMMU performance.
>
> This method may lose some of DMA remapping benefits like isolation.
>
> The first patch defines iommu_identity_mapping varialbe which controls the
> identity mapping code and is 0 by default.
The only real difference between "pt" and "identity" is hardware support.
We should have a single value we don't have to tell users to do different
things depending on their hardware (they won't even know what they have)
to achieve the same result.
thanks,
-chris
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists