[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20090618132410.0b55cd90.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 13:24:10 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
Cc: linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] bootmem.c: Avoid c90 declaration warning
On Thu, 18 Jun 2009 13:07:13 -0700
Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com> wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
>
> diff --git a/mm/bootmem.c b/mm/bootmem.c
> index 282df0a..09d9c98 100644
> --- a/mm/bootmem.c
> +++ b/mm/bootmem.c
> @@ -536,11 +536,13 @@ static void * __init alloc_arch_preferred_bootmem(bootmem_data_t *bdata,
> return kzalloc(size, GFP_NOWAIT);
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_BOOTMEM
> + {
> bootmem_data_t *p_bdata;
>
> p_bdata = bootmem_arch_preferred_node(bdata, size, align, goal, limit);
> if (p_bdata)
> return alloc_bootmem_core(p_bdata, size, align, goal, limit);
> + }
> #endif
> return NULL;
> }
Well yes.
We'll be needing some tabs there.
Unrelatedly, I'm struggling a bit with bootmem_arch_preferred_node().
It's only defined if CONFIG_X86_32=y && CONFIG_NEED_MULTIPLE_NODES=y,
but it gets called if CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_BOOTMEM=y.
Is this correct, logical and as simple as we can make it??
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists