[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090619095148.67a74ed9@hskinnemoen-d830>
Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2009 09:51:48 +0200
From: Haavard Skinnemoen <haavard.skinnemoen@...el.com>
To: David Brownell <david-b@...bell.net>
Cc: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...el.com>, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org,
avictor.za@...il.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
patrice.vilchez@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] at91/USB: at91sam9g45 series USB host integration
David Brownell wrote:
> > --- a/arch/arm/mach-at91/at91sam9g45_devices.c
> > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-at91/at91sam9g45_devices.c
> > + /* Enable VBus control for UHP ports */
> > + for (i = 0; i < data->ports; i++) {
> > + if (data->vbus_pin[i])
> > + at91_set_gpio_output(data->vbus_pin[i], 0);
>
> This should gpio_request() and gpio_direction_output().
Hmm...I thought the driver was supposed to call gpio_request(), not the
platform code?
> Don't use AT91-specific GPIO calls except for things that
> the generic calls don't support ... like enabling open-drain
> outputs, the deglitching support, or input pullups.
This call does port configuration, which you convinced me a long time
ago was a fundamentally different thing from GPIO. If the pin really
requires one of those features, this would definitely be the place to
set it up.
Haavard
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists