[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <520B2A28AACEE94388C511BBB8349337078E5420A5@IGR-IMC-01.corp.win-professional.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2009 13:52:50 +0200
From: "Morten P.D. Stevens" <mstevens@...-professional.com>
To: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
CC: "jmerkey@...fmountaingroup.com" <jmerkey@...fmountaingroup.com>,
"david@...g.hm" <david@...g.hm>,
"brong@...tmail.fm" <brong@...tmail.fm>
Subject: RE: Xen vs. KVM
2009/6/18 <jmerkey@...fmountaingroup.com>:
> They are both buggy. but Xen is BUGGIER.
>
> Before you call bullshit try eating your own dogfood. I threw both of
> these pieces of shit away in the trash and went back to VMWare, which is
> slower than crap, but it least it fucking works.
No, just try a commercial solution like Sun xVM, Oracle VM or Citrix XenServer. All of these products are ready for commercial usage and 100% rockstable like vmware.
All unstable/experimental code will be merged into linux, but a super amazing virtualization platform like xen won´t be merged? this is absurd!
Many companies are behind xen for example: Sun, Intel, AMD, IBM, HP, Red Hat, Novell/SuSE, Citrix even Microsoft!
Who supports kvm? Nobody, beside of some kernel developers.
-
Morten
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists