linux-kernel - RE: Xen vs. KVM

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 19 Jun 2009 13:52:50 +0200
From:	"Morten P.D. Stevens" <mstevens@...-professional.com>
To:	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
CC:	"jmerkey@...fmountaingroup.com" <jmerkey@...fmountaingroup.com>,
	"david@...g.hm" <david@...g.hm>,
	"brong@...tmail.fm" <brong@...tmail.fm>
Subject: RE: Xen vs. KVM

2009/6/18  <jmerkey@...fmountaingroup.com>:

> They are both buggy.  but Xen is BUGGIER.
>
> Before you call bullshit try eating your own dogfood.  I threw both of
> these pieces of shit away in the trash and went back to VMWare, which is
> slower than crap, but it least it fucking works.

No, just try a commercial solution like Sun xVM, Oracle VM or Citrix XenServer. All of these products are ready for commercial usage and 100% rockstable like vmware.

All unstable/experimental code will be merged into linux, but a super amazing virtualization platform like xen won´t be merged? this is absurd!

Many companies are behind xen for example: Sun, Intel, AMD, IBM, HP, Red Hat, Novell/SuSE, Citrix even Microsoft!

Who supports kvm? Nobody, beside of some kernel developers.

-

Morten
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/