| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20090619123504.GB18428@Krystal>
Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2009 08:35:04 -0400
From: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca>
To: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
Cc: Jason Baron <jbaron@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
mingo@...e.hu, laijs@...fujitsu.com, rostedt@...dmis.org,
peterz@...radead.org, jiayingz@...gle.com, bligh@...gle.com,
roland@...hat.com, fche@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/7] add syscall tracepoints
* Frederic Weisbecker (fweisbec@...il.com) wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 05:24:54PM -0400, Jason Baron wrote:
> >
> > add two tracepoints in syscall exit and entry path, conditioned on
> > TIF_SYSCALL_FTRACE. Supports the syscall trace event code.
> >
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jason Baron <jbaron@...hat.com>
> >
> > ---
> > arch/x86/kernel/ptrace.c | 6 ++++--
> > include/trace/syscall.h | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
> > kernel/tracepoint.c | 38 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > 3 files changed, 60 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/ptrace.c b/arch/x86/kernel/ptrace.c
> > index 09ecbde..1c7301a 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/kernel/ptrace.c
> > +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/ptrace.c
> > @@ -36,6 +36,8 @@
> > #include <asm/ds.h>
> >
> > #include <trace/syscall.h>
> > +DEFINE_TRACE(syscall_enter);
> > +DEFINE_TRACE(syscall_exit);
> >
> > #include "tls.h"
> >
> > @@ -1498,7 +1500,7 @@ asmregparm long syscall_trace_enter(struct pt_regs *regs)
> > ret = -1L;
> >
> > if (unlikely(test_thread_flag(TIF_SYSCALL_FTRACE)))
> > - ftrace_syscall_enter(regs);
> > + trace_syscall_enter(regs, regs->orig_ax);
> >
> > if (unlikely(current->audit_context)) {
> > if (IS_IA32)
> > @@ -1524,7 +1526,7 @@ asmregparm void syscall_trace_leave(struct pt_regs *regs)
> > audit_syscall_exit(AUDITSC_RESULT(regs->ax), regs->ax);
> >
> > if (unlikely(test_thread_flag(TIF_SYSCALL_FTRACE)))
> > - ftrace_syscall_exit(regs);
> > + trace_syscall_exit(regs, regs->ax);
> >
> > if (test_thread_flag(TIF_SYSCALL_TRACE))
> > tracehook_report_syscall_exit(regs, 0);
> > diff --git a/include/trace/syscall.h b/include/trace/syscall.h
> > index 8cfe515..d5d8310 100644
> > --- a/include/trace/syscall.h
> > +++ b/include/trace/syscall.h
> > @@ -2,6 +2,24 @@
> > #define _TRACE_SYSCALL_H
> >
> > #include <asm/ptrace.h>
> > +#include <linux/tracepoint.h>
> > +
> > +extern void syscall_regfunc(void);
> > +extern void syscall_unregfunc(void);
> > +
> > +DECLARE_TRACE_REG(syscall_enter,
> > + TP_PROTO(struct pt_regs *regs, long id),
> > + TP_ARGS(regs, id),
> > + syscall_regfunc,
> > + syscall_unregfunc
> > +);
> > +
> > +DECLARE_TRACE_REG(syscall_exit,
> > + TP_PROTO(struct pt_regs *regs, long ret),
> > + TP_ARGS(regs, ret),
> > + syscall_regfunc,
> > + syscall_unregfunc
> > +);
> >
> > /*
> > * A syscall entry in the ftrace syscalls array.
> > diff --git a/kernel/tracepoint.c b/kernel/tracepoint.c
> > index 1ef5d3a..5b34ff9 100644
> > --- a/kernel/tracepoint.c
> > +++ b/kernel/tracepoint.c
>
>
>
> At a first glance I wasn't sure tracepoint.c is the right
> place for these.
> But indeed putting those two callbacks here avoids any
> dependency to the syscall tracer when someone else needs
> the syscall tracepoints.
>
> Well, I guess we can keep them there.
>
>
>
> > @@ -24,6 +24,7 @@
> > #include <linux/tracepoint.h>
> > #include <linux/err.h>
> > #include <linux/slab.h>
> > +#include <linux/sched.h>
> >
> > extern struct tracepoint __start___tracepoints[];
> > extern struct tracepoint __stop___tracepoints[];
> > @@ -577,3 +578,40 @@ static int init_tracepoints(void)
> > __initcall(init_tracepoints);
> >
> > #endif /* CONFIG_MODULES */
> > +
> > +DEFINE_MUTEX(regfunc_mutex);
> > +int sys_tracepoint_refcount;
>
>
> Looks like regfunc_mutex is only there to protect
> sys_tracepoint_refcount. May be you can just make it atomic_t?
>
Nope, regfunc_mutex makes sure there is no disable/enable occuring
concurrently. They only take a tasklist read lock, so they can happen
concurrently if it wasn't for the regfunc_mutex.
Unless I'm missing something totally obvious about the refcount, the
mutex is needed, and there is no need to go for an atomic type in this
case.
Thanks,
Mathieu
> Thanks,
> Frederic.
>
>
> > +
> > +void syscall_regfunc(void)
> > +{
> > + unsigned long flags;
> > + struct task_struct *g, *t;
> > +
> > + mutex_lock(®func_mutex);
> > + if (!sys_tracepoint_refcount) {
> > + read_lock_irqsave(&tasklist_lock, flags);
> > + do_each_thread(g, t) {
> > + set_tsk_thread_flag(t, TIF_SYSCALL_FTRACE);
> > + } while_each_thread(g, t);
> > + read_unlock_irqrestore(&tasklist_lock, flags);
> > + }
> > + sys_tracepoint_refcount++;
> > + mutex_unlock(®func_mutex);
> > +}
> > +
> > +void syscall_unregfunc(void)
> > +{
> > + unsigned long flags;
> > + struct task_struct *g, *t;
> > +
> > + mutex_lock(®func_mutex);
> > + sys_tracepoint_refcount--;
> > + if (!sys_tracepoint_refcount) {
> > + read_lock_irqsave(&tasklist_lock, flags);
> > + do_each_thread(g, t) {
> > + clear_tsk_thread_flag(t, TIF_SYSCALL_FTRACE);
> > + } while_each_thread(g, t);
> > + read_unlock_irqrestore(&tasklist_lock, flags);
> > + }
> > + mutex_unlock(®func_mutex);
> > +}
> > --
> > 1.6.0.6
> >
>
--
Mathieu Desnoyers
OpenPGP key fingerprint: 8CD5 52C3 8E3C 4140 715F BA06 3F25 A8FE 3BAE 9A68
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists