linux-kernel - Re: [ath5k-devel] [PATCH 1/1] ath5k: fix beacon

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <b6c5339f0906181814p7f052822je8903629445c8a30@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Thu, 18 Jun 2009 21:14:54 -0400
From:	Bob Copeland <bcopeland@...il.com>
To:	Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...il.com>
Cc:	"John W. Linville" <linville@...driver.com>,
	linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	ath5k-devel@...ema.h4ckr.net
Subject: Re: [ath5k-devel] [PATCH 1/1] ath5k: fix beacon_int handling

On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 7:06 PM, Jiri Slaby<jirislaby@...il.com> wrote:
> 73ca5203366235f8a43e490767284ba8cfd8c479
> (ath5k: remove conf->beacon_int usage)
> removed bintval setting from ath5k_config. We need to init the
> interval earlier and don't touch it in add_interface anymore.
>
> Otherwise it will be set only once by upper layer through
> bss_info_changed but not on second and further hostap executions.

Shouldn't we just not destroy the value in add_interface?

I thought conf->beacon_int was deprecated.

-- 
Bob Copeland %% www.bobcopeland.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/