[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1245375140.14766.25.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 21:32:20 -0400
From: Jon Masters <jonathan@...masters.org>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Jon Masters <jcm@...masters.org>, mingo@...e.hu,
tglx@...utronix.de, williams@...hat.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PULL] hardware latency detector
On Thu, 2009-06-18 at 18:25 -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
> On Thu, 18 Jun 2009, Jon Masters wrote:
> >
> > Please pull "hwlat", the hardware latency detector for 2.6.31.
>
> I really want to know more before I pull.
Ok.
> Has this been in -next?
No, it hasn't. But it has been tested quite extensively by a number of
people and is currently in the -rt tree.
> Discussed on lkml?
Yes. I posted an RFC patch back when it was called the SMI detector,
then a patch last week with the new generic name of hardware latency
detector (at Ingo's suggestion of renaming).
> How does it work?
It started as an SMI detector. Basically, when this module is loaded and
enabled, it will grab all CPUs in periodic calls to stop_machine and sit
in a configurable loop, looking for unexplainable latencies. Doing it
this way allows us to look for something stealing the CPU from Linux
without the kernel knowing - we report the statistics via debugfs.
Hope that helps! Thanks Linus!
Jon.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists