[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090619201159.35d259bb@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2009 20:11:59 +0100
From: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To: Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu
Cc: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>, James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>,
Joseph Cihula <joseph.cihula@...el.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
arjan@...ux.intel.com, hpa@...or.com, andi@...stfloor.org,
Chris Wright <chrisw@...s-sol.org>, jbeulich@...ell.com,
peterm@...hat.com, gang.wei@...el.com, shane.wang@...el.com
Subject: Re: [RFC v4][PATCH 2/2] intel_txt: Intel(R) TXT and tboot kernel
support
> "Somebody has screwed with this kernel image, and you're not booting what you
> thought you were booting."
So I screw with your user space - you can't measure enough to make it
save you in a general setup. Too much I can hit changes each boot.
For a tiny number of very special cases that are highly controlled it has
potential uses. Some of those are evil some are ones with meaningful uses
(eg ATM machines) - although attacks there have included hardware attacks
outside the PC components too.
Personally (and I'm sure Intel disagrees with me) my bigger work is that
I can't verify that the magic block of code for tboot is correct.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists