linux-kernel - Re: Low latency I/O scheduling

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1245446787.5475.14.camel@localhost>
Date:	Sat, 20 Jun 2009 00:26:27 +0300
From:	Maxim Levitsky <maximlevitsky@...il.com>
To:	Corrado Zoccolo <czoccolo@...il.com>
Cc:	Linux-Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>
Subject: Re: Low latency I/O scheduling

On Mon, 2009-06-08 at 19:40 +0200, Corrado Zoccolo wrote:
> Hi,
> sometime ago on the mailing list, the issue of too high latencies
> introduced by I/O scheduling was raised.
> I've done some study, and identified a way to improve on workloads
> that have >1 random readers.

You can say that again....

While there was all the fuzz about CPU scheduler, just doing some heavy
IO can literally stall the system for minutes (and I am not talking
about swap trashing, I have here 2 GB, and about 400 MB used)


Sometimes it goes so far, that I have to suspend the offending process.
I mostly compile stuff, buf file copies have even worse effect.


I tried CFQ, AS, and didn't see much difference
(but ionice on CFQ really helps)

Best regards,
	Maxim Levitsky

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/