[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4A3B028C.2040902@cn.fujitsu.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2009 11:14:20 +0800
From: Li Zefan <lizf@...fujitsu.com>
To: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
CC: Jason Baron <jbaron@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
mingo@...e.hu, laijs@...fujitsu.com, rostedt@...dmis.org,
peterz@...radead.org, mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca,
jiayingz@...gle.com, bligh@...gle.com, roland@...hat.com,
fche@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/7] add syscall tracepoints
Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 05:24:59PM -0400, Jason Baron wrote:
>> update FTRACE_SYSCALL_MAX to the current number of syscalls
>>
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jason Baron <jbaron@...hat.com>
>>
>> ---
>> arch/x86/include/asm/ftrace.h | 4 ++--
>> 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/ftrace.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/ftrace.h
>> index bd2c651..d16d195 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/ftrace.h
>> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/ftrace.h
>> @@ -30,9 +30,9 @@
>>
>> /* FIXME: I don't want to stay hardcoded */
>
>
> BTW, is there a way to know this size dynamically?
> Or is there already a hardcoded number of syscalls somewhere
> in x86?
>
Does this patchset head for .31 or .32? If for .32, then this patch should
go into .31 I think.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists