[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090620191034.48fa085a@lappy.seanm.ca>
Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2009 19:10:34 -0400
From: Sean MacLennan <smaclennan@...atech.com>
To: Frans Pop <elendil@...net.nl>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@...abs.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Badness on the Warp
On Sat, 20 Jun 2009 22:56:45 +0200
Frans Pop <elendil@...net.nl> wrote:
> The fact that your bisect ended at a merge essentially means that it
> is invalid. As a merge does not introduce any actual change (unless
> it includes changes to resolve conflicts), it normally cannot be the
> cause of a regression.
Makes sense I messed up somewhere. This is the commit that causes
problems:
Merge branch 'topic/slab/earlyboot' of git://git./linux/kernel/git/penberg/slab-2.6
* 'topic/slab/earlyboot' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/penberg/slab-2.6:
vgacon: use slab allocator instead of the bootmem allocator
irq: use kcalloc() instead of the bootmem allocator
sched: use slab in cpupri_init()
sched: use alloc_cpumask_var() instead of alloc_bootmem_cpumask_var()
memcg: don't use bootmem allocator in setup code
irq/cpumask: make memoryless node zero happy
x86: remove some alloc_bootmem_cpumask_var calling
vt: use kzalloc() instead of the bootmem allocator
sched: use kzalloc() instead of the bootmem allocator
init: introduce mm_init()
vmalloc: use kzalloc() instead of alloc_bootmem()
slab: setup allocators earlier in the boot sequence
bootmem: fix slab fallback on numa
bootmem: use slab if bootmem is no longer available
Makes sense since it is very early in the boot I get the badness. Also, there is no mention of JFS in the above logs.
Cheers,
Sean
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists