[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20090620.012107.75903817.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2009 01:21:07 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: jirislaby@...il.com
Cc: linux-driver@...gic.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] Net: qla3xxx, remove sleeping in atomic
From: Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...il.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2009 17:13:32 +0200
> Hi, we've found this sleep-inside-spinlock.
>
> The fix below totally untested, please review carefully.
>
> --
>
> We cannot sleep in ql_reset_work under spinlock, unlock before sleep,
> relock after.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...il.com>
This looks good. The spinlock is just required to be held
around the register accesses. It's going to drop the lock
as soon as the bits settle post-reset anyways and then the
driver goes off and modifies other state outside of the lock.
Applied, thanks!
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists