[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4A3DE3F3.4000100@linux.intel.com>
Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2009 00:40:35 -0700
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...ux.intel.com>
To: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
CC: Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@...il.com>,
Matthew Wilcox <matthew@....cx>,
Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org>,
Martin Mares <mj@....cz>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@...nel.org>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
linux-arch@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: RFC: x86: cap iomem_resource to addressable physical memory
Pavel Machek wrote:
> On Thu 2009-06-11 13:46:52, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
>> Yinghai Lu wrote:
>>> do we need do that on every cpu?
>>>
>>> looks like we could do that in identify_boot_cpu.
>>>
>> What if the CPUs are heterogenous? It's obviously a suboptimal
>> situation, but it doesn't seem like something we can rely on.
>
> Is it ok if that changes during runtime? What if someone hotplugs
> heterogenous cpu? I'd say basing it on boot cpu seems simplest.
> Pavel
>
If someone hotplugs heterogenous CPUs it should do the right thing if
the right thing is possible to do. If you already have resource
assignments that are unfulfillable you're screwed anyway.
-hpa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists