[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090621152116.GC3728@balbir.in.ibm.com>
Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2009 20:51:16 +0530
From: Balbir Singh <balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org, dm-devel@...hat.com,
jens.axboe@...cle.com, nauman@...gle.com, dpshah@...gle.com,
lizf@...fujitsu.com, mikew@...gle.com, fchecconi@...il.com,
paolo.valente@...more.it, ryov@...inux.co.jp,
fernando@....ntt.co.jp, s-uchida@...jp.nec.com, taka@...inux.co.jp,
guijianfeng@...fujitsu.com, jmoyer@...hat.com,
dhaval@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, righi.andrea@...il.com,
m-ikeda@...jp.nec.com, jbaron@...hat.com, agk@...hat.com,
snitzer@...hat.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, peterz@...radead.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] IO scheduler based io controller (V5)
* Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com> [2009-06-19 16:37:18]:
>
> Hi All,
>
> Here is the V5 of the IO controller patches generated on top of 2.6.30.
[snip]
> Testing
> =======
>
[snip]
I've not been reading through the discussions in complete detail, but
I see no reference to async reads or aio. In the case of aio, aio
presumes the context of the user space process. Could you elaborate on
any testing you've done with these cases?
--
Balbir
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists