linux-kernel - Re: New IDE maintainer (was Re: cmd64x: irq 14: nobody cared

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20090622100021.a40aa1fd.sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Date:	Mon, 22 Jun 2009 10:00:21 +1000
From:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:	bzolnier@...il.com, elendil@...net.nl, sparclinux@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-ide@...r.kernel.org, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: New IDE maintainer (was Re: cmd64x: irq 14: nobody cared -
 system is dreadfully slow)

Hi Dave, Bart,

On Sun, 21 Jun 2009 16:13:43 -0700 (PDT) David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> wrote:
>
> From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
> Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2009 15:57:56 -0700 (PDT)
> 
> > From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@...il.com>
> > Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2009 00:34:22 +0200
> > 
> >> Lets get over this quickly, since you seem to have such a great
> >> insight into running IDE layer here is a little proposition..
> >> 
> >> ACK?  [ If not than can we please get back with the program? ]
> > 
> > Acked-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
> 
> I've created a new IDE development tree at:
> 
> 	master.kernel.org:/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/davem/ide-2.6.git

So, do I immediately switch linux-next to this tree?  The current tree I
am using is empty (relative to Linus' tree).

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@...b.auug.org.au
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped