[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200906221317.04166.arnd@arndb.de>
Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2009 13:17:03 +0200
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To: Marco Stornelli <marco.stornelli@...il.com>
Cc: Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>,
Linux FS Devel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Embedded <linux-embedded@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/14] Pramfs: Include files
On Monday 22 June 2009, Marco Stornelli wrote:
> > It's still a problem. You might be creating a file system image
> > for an embedded board with a different endianess.
>
> It's not possible to create an "image" with pramfs, it's like tmpfs.
But the data is persistant, you even support using it as a root file
system, so the data has to have a way to get there. Even if you
don't do it right now, I don't see any fundamental limitation that
prevents you from creating an image on one machine and dumping it
into the nvram of another machine as part of manufacturing or testing.
> > Or even on the same machine, you could be looking at the file system contents
> > with a 32 bit process running on a 64 bit kernel.
>
> Yes, indeed the most important thing is to be sure that a 64bit kernel
> works well. I'll try to test it in this environment. If there are
> "64bit guys" to help me to test it, it'd be great.
This particular problem (__kernel_off_t on 64-bit machines) can be avoided
by just switching to __kernel_loff_t, which is 64 bit long on all machines,
while __kernel_off_t is always the register length (32 or 64 bits).
Arnd <><
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists