linux-kernel - [PATCH] cs5520: add missing IRQ setup for the second port

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 22 Jun 2009 13:48:02 +0200
From:	Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@...il.com>
To:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:	linux-ide@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] cs5520: add missing IRQ setup for the second port

From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@...il.com>
Subject: [PATCH] cs5520: add missing IRQ setup for the second port

Signed-off-by: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@...il.com>
---
This is obviously correct regression fix.  The only problem is that
it cannot be applied under the new rigid policy before somebody with
the hardware verifies it.  This will only result in a needless delay
in this case (IMHO a common sense works better than rigid policies).

 drivers/ide/cs5520.c |    1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

Index: b/drivers/ide/cs5520.c
===================================================================
--- a/drivers/ide/cs5520.c
+++ b/drivers/ide/cs5520.c
@@ -135,6 +135,7 @@ static int __devinit cs5520_init_one(str
 
 	ide_pci_setup_ports(dev, d, &hw[0], &hws[0]);
 	hw[0].irq = 14;
+	hw[1].irq = 15;
 
 	return ide_host_add(d, hws, 2, NULL);
 }
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/