[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200906221348.02632.bzolnier@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2009 13:48:02 +0200
From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@...il.com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: linux-ide@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] cs5520: add missing IRQ setup for the second port
From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@...il.com>
Subject: [PATCH] cs5520: add missing IRQ setup for the second port
Signed-off-by: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@...il.com>
---
This is obviously correct regression fix. The only problem is that
it cannot be applied under the new rigid policy before somebody with
the hardware verifies it. This will only result in a needless delay
in this case (IMHO a common sense works better than rigid policies).
drivers/ide/cs5520.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
Index: b/drivers/ide/cs5520.c
===================================================================
--- a/drivers/ide/cs5520.c
+++ b/drivers/ide/cs5520.c
@@ -135,6 +135,7 @@ static int __devinit cs5520_init_one(str
ide_pci_setup_ports(dev, d, &hw[0], &hws[0]);
hw[0].irq = 14;
+ hw[1].irq = 15;
return ide_host_add(d, hws, 2, NULL);
}
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists