[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090622115841.GP24366@elte.hu>
Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2009 13:58:41 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: eranian@...il.com
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Robert Richter <robert.richter@....com>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
Maynard Johnson <mpjohn@...ibm.com>,
Carl Love <cel@...ibm.com>,
Corey J Ashford <cjashfor@...ibm.com>,
Philip Mucci <mucci@...s.utk.edu>,
Dan Terpstra <terpstra@...s.utk.edu>,
perfmon2-devel <perfmon2-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: IV.1 - Support for model-specific uncore PMU
> IV/ Open questions
>
> 1/ Support for model-specific uncore PMU monitoring capabilities
>
> Recent processors have multiple PMUs. Typically one per core and
> but also one at the socket level, e.g., Intel Nehalem. It is
> expected that this API will provide access to these PMU as well.
>
> It seems like with the current API, raw events for those PMU would
> need a new architecture-specific type as the event encoding by
> itself may not be enough to disambiguate between a core and uncore
> PMU event.
>
> How are those events going to be supported?
(Please see our reply to II.2.)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists