[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <FCCFB4CDC6E5564B9182F639FC35608702F54618F0@dbde02.ent.ti.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2009 18:54:45 +0530
From: "Pandita, Vikram" <vikram.pandita@...com>
To: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>
CC: Marc Zyngier <maz@...terjones.org>,
"linux-serial@...r.kernel.org" <linux-serial@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-omap@...r.kernel.org" <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.arm.linux.org.uk"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.arm.linux.org.uk>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] serial: 8250: add IRQ trigger support
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Alan Cox [mailto:alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk]
>Sent: Monday, June 22, 2009 8:24 AM
>To: Tony Lindgren
>Cc: Marc Zyngier; Pandita, Vikram; linux-serial@...r.kernel.org; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org; linux-
>omap@...r.kernel.org; linux-arm-kernel@...ts.arm.linux.org.uk
>Subject: Re: [PATCH] serial: 8250: add IRQ trigger support
>
>> To me it sounds like the it would be better to have unsigned
>> long irqflags in struct uart_port instead of trying to squeeze
>> the irqflags the flags field. We're already not covering all the
>> irqflags currently like Marc pointed out.
>
>Agreed.
I can post a patch with new irqflags in uart_port.
Expect a patch today.
>
>Alan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists