[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20090622113652.21E7.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2009 11:39:53 +0900 (JST)
From: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>
To: Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...il.com>
Cc: kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com,
Maxim Levitsky <maximlevitsky@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Lee Schermerhorn <Lee.Schermerhorn@...com>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux-foundation.org>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>
Subject: Re: BUG: Bad page state [was: Strange oopses in 2.6.30]
(cc to Mel and some reviewer)
> Flags are:
> 0000000000400000 -- __PG_MLOCKED
> 800000000050000c -- my page flags
> 3650000c -- Maxim's page flags
> 0000000000693ce1 -- my PAGE_FLAGS_CHECK_AT_FREE
I guess commit da456f14d (page allocator: do not disable interrupts in
free_page_mlock()) is a bit wrong.
current code is:
-------------------------------------------------------------
static void free_hot_cold_page(struct page *page, int cold)
{
(snip)
int clearMlocked = PageMlocked(page);
(snip)
if (free_pages_check(page))
return;
(snip)
local_irq_save(flags);
if (unlikely(clearMlocked))
free_page_mlock(page);
-------------------------------------------------------------
Oh well, we remove PG_Mlocked *after* free_pages_check().
Then, it makes false-positive warning.
Sorry, my review was also wrong. I think reverting this patch is better ;)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists