[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090622143613.GU19977@parisc-linux.org>
Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2009 08:36:13 -0600
From: Matthew Wilcox <matthew@....cx>
To: Ralf Baechle <ralf@...ux-mips.org>
Cc: Alex Chiang <achiang@...com>, jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org,
linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, Kyle McMartin <kyle@...artin.ca>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Yoshinori Sato <ysato@...rs.sourceforge.jp>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Jeff Dike <jdike@...toit.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
Paul Mundt <lethal@...ux-sh.org>,
Ivan Kokshaysky <ink@...assic.park.msu.ru>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PCI: remove pcibios_scan_all_fns()
On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 03:26:02PM +0100, Ralf Baechle wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 08:08:07AM -0600, Alex Chiang wrote:
> > This was #define'd as 0 on all platforms, so let's get rid of it.
> >
> > This change makes pci_scan_slot() slightly easier to read.
>
> I don't see why one would want to have a non-zero pcibios_scan_all_fns()
> anyway.
If you have real hardware, absolutely. If you have a hypervisor that
gives you function 5 of a device (instead of mapping your function 0 to
function 5 of the real device), you'll want something along these lines.
--
Matthew Wilcox Intel Open Source Technology Centre
"Bill, look, we understand that you're interested in selling us this
operating system, but compare it to ours. We can't possibly take such
a retrograde step."
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists