linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] v4 RCU: the bloatwatch edition

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20090622082941.c5c8b3f3.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date:	Mon, 22 Jun 2009 08:29:41 -0700
From:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc:	David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>, paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, niv@...ibm.com, dvhltc@...ibm.com,
	lethal@...ux-sh.org, kernel@...tstofly.org, matthew@....cx
Subject: Re: [PATCH] v4 RCU: the bloatwatch edition

On Mon, 22 Jun 2009 14:49:51 +0200 Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu> wrote:

> 
> * David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com> wrote:
> 
> > Hi Paul,
> > 
> > Are you going to push your RCU patch for this merge window?
> 
> Andrew needs to be convinced for that to happen.
> 

whome?  I rarely have firm opinions on anything.  iirc the question
here was "is it worth adding another RCU implementation to save 900
bytes"?

I find it pretty hard to see how to come up with "yes" for that one but
it's hardly a huge issue.  If you guys feel otherwise then go wild.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/