[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4851.1245687329@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2009 17:15:29 +0100
From: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
To: paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com
Cc: dhowells@...hat.com, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
niv@...ibm.com, dvhltc@...ibm.com, lethal@...ux-sh.org,
kernel@...tstofly.org, matthew@....cx
Subject: Re: [PATCH] v4 RCU: the bloatwatch edition
Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> Of course, I well remember programming systems with 4K of core memory
> back in the 1970s, and therefore feel a bit guilty about sticking deep
> embedded platforms with the increase in memory footprint represented
> by Hierarchical RCU compared to Classic RCU. And Bloatwatch RCU is much
> smaller and easier to understand/maintain than is Classic RCU.
Both Fujitsu and Panasonic really want to keep the kernel size down.
Squeezing a kernel into a megabyte or less of flash is one of the main aims,
and anything that saves nearly 1K is not to be sneered at.
David
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists