[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.01.0906221241130.3240@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2009 12:43:06 -0700 (PDT)
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Andrew Lutomirski <luto@....edu>
cc: Thomas Hellström <thomas@...pmail.org>,
Dave Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
Alex Deucher <alexdeucher@...il.com>, dri-devel@...ts.sf.net,
Jerome Glisse <jglisse@...hat.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [git pull] drm: previous pull req + 1.
On Mon, 22 Jun 2009, Andrew Lutomirski wrote:
>
> What if we only guaranteed that the framebuffer is mapped when it's
> showing on the screen?
I think that works ok. We only care about printk being immediate in that
case, and if it gets buffered I don't think we care.
> printk doesn't need to write to the framebuffer immediately when X
> isn't running (since the framebuffer isn't shown) and presumably the
> framebuffer needs to be pinned somewhere when it's being displayed
> anyway. This would involve fbcon knowing how to buffer text to be
> shown later so that printk still works in interrupt context.
But doesn't fbcon do that _anyway_ for VC switching?
(I've tried to stay out of fbcon, and have traditionally personally always
preferred just regular VGA text mode, so I really have no clue about the
internals).
Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists